Methodological Artefacts in Consciousness Science

Journal of Consciousness Studies 24 (11-12):94-117 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Consciousness is scientifically challenging to study because of its subjective aspect. This leads researchers to rely on report-based experimental paradigms in order to discover neural correlates of consciousness (NCCs). I argue that the reliance on reports has biased the search for NCCs, thus creating what I call 'methodological artefacts'. This paper has three main goals: first, describe the measurement problem in consciousness science and argue that this problem led to the emergence of methodological artefacts. Second, provide a critical assessment of the NCCs put forward by the global neuronal workspace theory. Third, provide the means of dissociating genuine NCCs from methodological artefacts.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MICMAI-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-12-10
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-12-10

Total downloads
138 ( #16,125 of 35,440 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
40 ( #8,288 of 35,440 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.