Methodological Artefacts in Consciousness Science

Journal of Consciousness Studies 24 (11-12):94-117 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Consciousness is scientifically challenging to study because of its subjective aspect. This leads researchers to rely on report-based experimental paradigms in order to discover neural correlates of consciousness (NCCs). I argue that the reliance on reports has biased the search for NCCs, thus creating what I call 'methodological artefacts'. This paper has three main goals: first, describe the measurement problem in consciousness science and argue that this problem led to the emergence of methodological artefacts. Second, provide a critical assessment of the NCCs put forward by the global neuronal workspace theory. Third, provide the means of dissociating genuine NCCs from methodological artefacts.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MICMAI-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-12-10
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-12-10

Total views
408 ( #12,133 of 54,623 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
55 ( #12,120 of 54,623 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.