Husain Sarkar, Descartes' Cogito: Saved from the Great Shipwreck Reviewed by

Philosophy in Review 24 (3):220-222 (2004)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In Descartes' Cogito, Saved from the Great Shipwreck, Husain Sarkar convincingly argues that the Cartesian cogito as it appears in Meditation Two cannot be an argument but must be understood as an intuition emerging from the process of ('extraordinary') doubt. Sarkar mentions in the Preface that only the negative part of his thesis in intended to be decisive (X). However, as the book unfolds it becomes evident that his "positive" effort, his interpretation of the cogito as an intuition although not decisive, is no less important. Sarkar shows how his reading of the cogito can account for other aspects of Descartes' writings (memory, the will, the theory of deduction) and offers this as further proof for the correctness of his interpretation.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MIHHSD
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-10-01
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-02-14

Total views
145 ( #22,471 of 43,973 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #22,765 of 43,973 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.