The Hard Problem Of Content: Solved (Long Ago)

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper, I argue that even if the Hard Problem of Content, as identified by Hutto and Myin, is important, it was already solved in natu- ralized semantics, and satisfactory solutions to the problem do not rely merely on the notion of information as covariance. I point out that Hutto and Myin have double standards for linguistic and mental representation, which leads to a peculiar inconsistency. Were they to apply the same standards to basic and linguistic minds, they would either have to embrace representationalism or turn to semantic nihilism, which is, as I argue, an unstable and unattractive position. Hence, I conclude, their book does not offer an alternative to representation- alism. At the same time, it reminds us that representational talk in cognitive science cannot be taken for granted and that information is different from men- tal representation. Although this claim is not new, Hutto and Myin defend it forcefully and elegantly.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-12-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Studies in the Logic of Explanation.Hempel, Carl G. & Oppenheim, Paul
Doing Without Representing.Clark, Andy & Toribio, Josefa

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total downloads
284 ( #8,972 of 37,098 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
57 ( #6,038 of 37,098 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.