Animal suicide: An account worth giving? Commentary on Peña-Guzmán on Animal Suicide

Animal Sentience 20 (19) (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Peña-Guzmán (2017) argues that empirical evidence and evolutionary theory compel us to treat the phenomenon of suicide as continuous in the animal kingdom. He defends a “continuist” account in which suicide is a multiply-realizable phenomenon characterized by self-injurious and self-annihilative behaviors. This view is problematic for several reasons. First, it appears to mischaracterize the Darwinian view that mind is continuous in nature. Second, by focusing only on surface-level features of behavior, it groups causally and etiologically disparate phenomena under a single conceptual umbrella, thereby reducing the account’s explanatory power. Third, it obscures existing analyses of suicide in biomedical ethics and animal welfare literatures. A more promising naturalistic approach might seek a theoretical understanding of the social/ecological circumstances that drive humans and perhaps other animals to self-destruction.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-05-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Science Gone Astray: Evolution and Rape. [REVIEW]Elisabeth A. Lloyd - 2001 - Michigan Law Review 99 (6):1536-1559.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
127 ( #29,330 of 50,238 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #33,806 of 50,238 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.