Contexts and pornography

Analysis 68 (4):316-320 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Jennifer Saul has argued that the speech acts approach to pornography, where pornography has the illocutionary force of subordinating women, is undermined by that very approach: if pornographic works are speech acts, they must be utterances in contexts; and if we take contexts seriously, it follows that only some pornographic viewings subordinate women. In an effort to defend the speech acts approach, Claudia Bianchi argues that Saul focuses on the wrong context to fix pornography’s illocutionary force. In response, I defend Saul arguing that Bianchi doesn’t show Saul has focused on the wrong context
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MIKCAP-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2012-10-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
486 ( #4,470 of 37,200 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
53 ( #6,614 of 37,200 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.