Contexts and pornography

Analysis 68 (4):316-320 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Jennifer Saul has argued that the speech acts approach to pornography, where pornography has the illocutionary force of subordinating women, is undermined by that very approach: if pornographic works are speech acts, they must be utterances in contexts; and if we take contexts seriously, it follows that only some pornographic viewings subordinate women. In an effort to defend the speech acts approach, Claudia Bianchi argues that Saul focuses on the wrong context to fix pornography’s illocutionary force. In response, I defend Saul arguing that Bianchi doesn’t show Saul has focused on the wrong context
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2012-10-09
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
804 ( #7,931 of 70,048 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
44 ( #19,337 of 70,048 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.