Evaluating Artificial Models of Cognition

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Artificial models of cognition serve different purposes, and their use determines the way they should be evaluated. There are also models that do not represent any particular biological agents, and there is controversy as to how they should be assessed. At the same time, modelers do evaluate such models as better or worse. There is also a widespread tendency to call for publicly available standards of replicability and benchmarking for such models. In this paper, I argue that proper evaluation ofmodels does not depend on whether they target real biological agents or not; instead, the standards of evaluation depend on the use of models rather than on the reality of their targets. I discuss how models are validated depending on their use and argue that all-encompassing benchmarks for models may be well beyond reach
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MIKEAM
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-04-27
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Explaining the Brain.Craver, Carl F.

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-04-17

Total views
162 ( #21,093 of 44,235 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #33,412 of 44,235 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.