Abstract
In this paper, an account of theoretical integration in cognitive (neuro)science from the mechanistic perspective is defended. It is argued that
mechanistic patterns of integration can be better understood in terms of
constraints on representations of mechanisms, not just on the space of possible mechanisms, as previous accounts of integration had it. This way,
integration can be analyzed in more detail with the help of constraintsatisfaction
account of coherence between scientific representations. In
particular, the account has resources to talk of idealizations and research
heuristics employed by researchers to combine separate results and
theoretical frameworks. The account is subsequently applied to an example of
successful integration in the research on hippocampus and memory, and to a failure of integration in the research on mirror neurons as purportedly
explanatory of sexual orientation.