Integrating cognitive (neuro)science using mechanisms

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper, an account of theoretical integration in cognitive (neuro)science from the mechanistic perspective is defended. It is argued that mechanistic patterns of integration can be better understood in terms of constraints on representations of mechanisms, not just on the space of possible mechanisms, as previous accounts of integration had it. This way, integration can be analyzed in more detail with the help of constraintsatisfaction account of coherence between scientific representations. In particular, the account has resources to talk of idealizations and research heuristics employed by researchers to combine separate results and theoretical frameworks. The account is subsequently applied to an example of successful integration in the research on hippocampus and memory, and to a failure of integration in the research on mirror neurons as purportedly explanatory of sexual orientation.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-11-04
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Explaining the Brain.Craver, Carl F.
Thinking About Mechanisms.Machamer, Peter K.; Darden, Lindley & Craver, Carl F.

View all 36 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
64 ( #31,410 of 42,338 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #33,166 of 42,338 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.