Ditching Dependence and Determination: Or, How to Wear the Crazy Trousers

Synthese (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper defends Flatland—the view that there exist neither determination nor dependence relations, and that everything is therefore fundamental—from the objection from explanatory inefficacy. According to that objection, Flatland is unattractive because it is unable to explain either the appearance as of there being determination relations, or the appearance as of there being dependence relations. We show how the Flatlander can meet the first challenge by offering four strategies—reducing, eliminating, untangling and omnizing—which, jointly, explain the appearance as of there being determination relations where no such relations obtain. Since, plausibly, dependence relations just are asymmetric determination relations, we argue that once we come mistakenly to believe that there exist determination relations, the existence of other asymmetries (conceptual and temporal) explains why it appears that there are dependence relations.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MILDDA-9
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-11-02
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-11-02

Total views
184 ( #25,076 of 53,644 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #26,367 of 53,644 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.