Morality in a Branching Universe

Disputatio 1 (20):1 - 21 (2006)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In most cases, we think that what settles what act it is right to perform is sensitive to what we take the facts about the world to be. But those facts include many controversial metaphysical claims about the world. I argue that depending on what metaphysical model we take to be correct, we will have very different views about what the right actions are. In particular, I argue that if a particular metaphysical model — the branching universe model — is correct, then many of our ethical intuitions are false. We need to think carefully about the relation between ethical and metaphysical intuitions, and ethical and metaphysical theories.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MILMIA-6
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-08-26
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
How Do We Know It is Now Now?Braddon-Mitchell, David
Theories of Actuality.Adams, Robert Merrihew
Time and Space.Dainton, Barry

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-07-06

Total views
229 ( #19,315 of 50,299 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #39,190 of 50,299 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.