Presentism, Passage, Phenomenology and Physicalism

Manuscrito 39 (4):183-201 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
ABSTRACT Temporal dynamists argue that we should believe that there exists temporal passage because there being passage is the best explanation for the presence of our temporal phenomenology. Presentists argue that presentism is the best version of temporal dynamism. Therefore, conditional on us accepting temporal dynamism, we should accept presentism. In this paper it is argued that if we understand temporal passage as the presentist does, such an argument can succeed only if dualism is true. Thus, we conclude, either presentists should embrace dualism, or they should reject any argument for presentism that proceeds via any such argument for temporal passage that proceeds via considerations of what best explains our temporal phenomenology.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MILPPP
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-03-08
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-12-16

Total views
23 ( #34,015 of 37,985 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #20,217 of 37,985 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.