Religion and Arguments from Silence

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Arguments from Silence have been used many times in attempts to discredit the foundations of religions. In this project, I demonstrate how one might judge the epistemic value of such arguments. To begin, I lay out for examination a specific argument from silence given by Walter Richard Cassels in his work Supernatural Religion. I then discuss a recently developed Bayesian approach for dealing with arguments from silence. Finally, using Cassels’s work and the work of some of the critics who replied to his argument, I argue for what probabilities might be applied in the use of the Bayesian method for testing the epistemic value Cassels’s argument and demonstrate how one might respond to similar arguments.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MILRAA-13
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-04-11
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-09-17

Total views
52 ( #37,727 of 45,415 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #31,214 of 45,415 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.