Random drift and the omniscient viewpoint

Philosophy of Science 63 (3):S10-S18 (1996)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Alexander Rosenberg (1994) claims that the omniscient viewpoint of the evolutionary process would have no need for the concept of random drift. However, his argument fails to take into account all of the processes which are considered to be instances of random drift. A consideration of these processes shows that random drift is not eliminable even given a position of omniscience. Furthermore, Rosenberg must take these processes into account in order to support his claims that evolution is deterministic and that evolutionary biology is an instrumental science.
No keywords specified (fix it)
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2013-11-27
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
251 ( #24,696 of 2,445,373 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #54,924 of 2,445,373 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.