Review of The Trace of God: A Rational Warrant for Belief. By Joseph Hinman [Book Review]

Studies in Religion 43 (3):529-531 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The ongoing debates about what rationality consists in remain unsettled and leave plenty of interpretation for what is rational in belief formation and action. Hinman risks a large step in seeming to assume that it is rational not to contravene scientific theories and findings and irrational to disallow this openness. These -- possibilities lending a potential for deistic beliefs not to be inconsistent with rationality. The presumed scientific approach to allowing a rationality in such belief revolves around the development of the so-called "M-scale" in the psychology of belief. The other, even more intense, global debate here is whether such an approach to rationality and rational belief is indeed valid, that is, the ongoing concen of whether such belief is consistent or not with scientific practice, understanding, and method. Readers interested in these debates should be interested in this unusual work and its purports
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MILROT-11
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-11-15
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-11-15

Total views
31 ( #46,585 of 50,236 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #25,207 of 50,236 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.