Seeing, Feeling, Doing: Mandatory Ultrasound Laws, Empathy and Abortion

Journal of Practical Ethics 6 (2):1-31 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In recent years, a number of US states have adopted laws that require pregnant women to have an ultrasound examination, and be shown images of their foetus, prior to undergoing a pregnancy termination. In this paper, I examine one of the basic presumptions of these laws: that seeing one’s foetus changes the ways in which one might act in regard to it, particularly in terms of the decision to terminate the pregnancy or not. I argue that mandatory ultrasound laws compel women into a position of moral spectatorship and require them to recognise the foetus as a being for whom they are responsible, particularly through empathic responses to ultrasound images. The approach I propose extends the project of a bioethics of the image and highlights the need for a critical analysis of the political mobilization of empathy in discussions of abortion.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MILSFD-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-01-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Against Empathy.Prinz, Jesse

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-01-07

Total views
68 ( #29,089 of 40,676 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
44 ( #13,281 of 40,676 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.