Abstract
In this paper, I argue that the thesis that time travel is logically possible, is
inconsistent with the necessary truth of any of the usual ‘open futureobjective
present’ models of the universe. It has been relatively uncontroversial
until recently to hold that presentism is inconsistent with the
possibility of time travel. I argue that recent arguments to the contrary
do not show that presentism is consistent with time travel. Moreover, the
necessary truth of other open future-objective present models which we
might, prima facie, have supposed to be more amenable to the possibility
of time travel, turn out also to be inconsistent with this possibility.