What is Hacking’s argument for entity realism?

Synthese 193 (3):991-1006 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
According to Ian Hacking’s Entity Realism, unobservable entities that scientists carefully manipulate to study other phenomena are real. Although Hacking presents his case in an intuitive, attractive, and persuasive way, his argument remains elusive. I present five possible readings of Hacking’s argument: a no-miracle argument, an indispensability argument, a transcendental argument, a Vichian argument, and a non-argument. I elucidate Hacking’s argument according to each reading, and review their strengths, their weaknesses, and their compatibility with each other
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MILWIH
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-05-26
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-05-26

Total views
1,736 ( #1,476 of 53,484 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
156 ( #2,849 of 53,484 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.