What is Hacking’s argument for entity realism?

Synthese 193 (3):991-1006 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
According to Ian Hacking’s Entity Realism, unobservable entities that scientists carefully manipulate to study other phenomena are real. Although Hacking presents his case in an intuitive, attractive, and persuasive way, his argument remains elusive. I present five possible readings of Hacking’s argument: a no-miracle argument, an indispensability argument, a transcendental argument, a Vichian argument, and a non-argument. I elucidate Hacking’s argument according to each reading, and review their strengths, their weaknesses, and their compatibility with each other
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MILWIH
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-05-26
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Scientific Realism and Primordial Cosmology.Azhar, Feraz & Butterfield, Jeremy

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-05-26

Total views
1,423 ( #1,366 of 44,471 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
245 ( #1,637 of 44,471 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.