Epistemic Disagreements: A Solution for Contextualists

Studia Philosophica Estonica 6 (1):15-23 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
My paper aims to account for the possibility of disagreements concerning what we know; for clearly, people disagree about what they know. More precisely, my goal is to explain how a contextualist theory of knowledge attributions can explain the existence of disagreement among speakers. My working hypothesis is that genuine epistemic disagreement is possible only under the assumption that the meaning of the word “knowledge” is governed by contexts that are objective, in the sense that the content of the word “knowledge” is fixed for all speakers sharing a common conversational goal. The paper is divided into two sections. In the first section, I explain why current versions of epistemic contextualism cannot account for epistemic disagreement. In the second section, following Christopher Gauker’s theory of linguistic communication, I offer my own contextualist solution to the problem of epistemic disagreement
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MIOEDA
Upload history
Archival date: 2014-01-13
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-12-23

Total views
166 ( #25,146 of 51,411 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #35,477 of 51,411 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.