- Submit
-
Browse
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- More
A Reply to James Marcum’s “What’s the Support for Kuhn’s Incommensurability Thesis?”
Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4 (11):21-24 (2015)
Abstract
I reply to James Marcum’s “What’s the Support for Kuhn’s Incommensurability Thesis? A Response to Mizrahi and Patton”Author's Profile
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-11-13
Downloads
344 (#66,006)
6 months
62 (#83,295)
2015-11-13
Downloads
344 (#66,006)
6 months
62 (#83,295)
Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?
