Gettier Cases, Mental States, and Best Explanations: Another Reply to Atkins

Logos and Episteme 9 (1):75-90 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I have argued that Gettier cases are misleading because, even though they appear to be cases of knowledge failure, they are in fact cases of semantic failure. Atkins has responded to my original paper and I have replied to his response. He has then responded again to insist that he has the so-called “Gettier intuition.” But he now admits that intuitions are only defeasible, not conclusive, evidence for and/or against philosophical theories. I address the implications of Atkins’ admission in this paper and I again show that his attempts to revise Gettier’s original cases such that they do not involve semantic failures are unsuccessful.
Reprint years
2018
ISBN(s)
2069-0533
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MIZGCM
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-03-27
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge as a Mental State.Jennifer Nagel - 2013 - Oxford Studies in Epistemology 4:275-310.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-03-27

Total views
89 ( #34,866 of 50,086 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #32,938 of 50,086 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.