The History of Science as a Graveyard of Theories: A Philosophers’ Myth?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
According to the antirealist argument known as the pessimistic induction, the history of science is a graveyard of dead scientific theories and abandoned theoretical posits. Support for this pessimistic picture of the history of science usually comes from a few case histories, such as the demise of the phlogiston theory and the abandonment of caloric as the substance of heat. In this article, I wish to take a new approach to examining the ‘history of science as a graveyard of theories’ picture. Using JSTOR Data for Research and Springer Exemplar, I present new lines of evidence that are at odds with this pessimistic picture of the history of science. When rigorously tested against the historical record of science, I submit, the pessimistic picture of the history of science as a graveyard of dead theories and abandoned posits may turn out to be no more than a philosophers’ myth.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-03-14
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
319 ( #21,104 of 64,222 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #23,267 of 64,222 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.