Why Arguments from Expert Opinion are still Weak: A Reply to Seidel

Informal Logic 36 (2):238-252 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper, I reply to Seidel’s objections against my argument from expert performance to the effect that arguments from expert opinion are weak arguments. I clarify what Seidel takes to be unclear points in my argument and show that it withstands Seidel’s objections.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MIZWAF-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-06-30
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-06-30

Total views
412 ( #16,161 of 64,221 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
49 ( #15,701 of 64,221 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.