Why Arguments from Expert Opinion are still Weak: A Reply to Seidel

Informal Logic 36 (2):238-252 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I reply to Seidel’s objections against my argument from expert performance to the effect that arguments from expert opinion are weak arguments. I clarify what Seidel takes to be unclear points in my argument and show that it withstands Seidel’s objections.

Author's Profile

Moti Mizrahi
Florida Institute of Technology

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
846 (#14,883)

6 months
168 (#14,656)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?