Why Hypothetical Syllogism is Invalid for Indicative Conditionals
Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):40-43 (2013)
Abstract
In this article, I present a schema for generating counterexamples to the argument form known as Hypothetical Syllogism with indicative conditionals. If my schema for generating counterexamples to HS works as I think it does, then HS is invalid for indicative conditionals
Categories
Reprint years
2013
DOI
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MIZWHS
Upload history
Archival date: 2013-07-02
View other versions
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-07-01
Total views
771 ( #6,696 of 2,445,677 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #22,587 of 2,445,677 )
2013-07-01
Total views
771 ( #6,696 of 2,445,677 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #22,587 of 2,445,677 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
