Epistemic theories of truth: The justifiability paradox investigated

In C. Martínez Vidal, U. Rivas Monroy & L. Villegas Forero (eds.), Verdad: Lógica, Representatión y Mundo. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. pp. 95-104 (1996)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Epistemic theories of truth, such as those presumed to be typical for anti-realism, can be characterised as saying that what is true can be known in principle: p → ◊Kp. However, with statements of the form “p & ¬Kp”, a contradiction arises if they are both true and known. Analysis of the nature of the paradox shows that such statements refute epistemic theories of truth only if the the anti-realist motivation for epistemic theories of truth is not taken into account. The motivation in a link of understandability ans meaningful- ness suggests to change the above principle and to restrict the theory to logically simple sentences, in which case the paradox does not arise. This suggestion also allows to see the deep philosophical problems for anti-realism those counterexamples are pointing at.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-10-09
Latest version: 4 (2016-01-28)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
.Williamson, Timothy
The Paradox of Knowability.Edgington, Dorothy
Intuitionism Disproved?Williamson, Timothy

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
543 ( #7,315 of 50,240 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
109 ( #4,402 of 50,240 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.