Legal vs. ethical obligations – a comment on the EPSRC’s principles for robotics

Connection Science 29 (2):137-141 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
While the 2010 EPSRC principles for robotics state a set of 5 rules of what ‘should’ be done, I argue they should differentiate between legal obligations and ethical demands. Only if we make this difference can we state clearly what the legal obligations already are, and what additional ethical demands we want to make. I provide suggestions how to revise the rules in this light and how to make them more structured.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MLLLVE
Upload history
First archival date: 2017-01-04
Latest version: 2 (2017-09-24)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-01-04

Total views
395 ( #11,243 of 51,206 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
62 ( #8,405 of 51,206 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.