Neopragmatist epistemology for ethics and the sciences: An optimistic sketch

Philosophy and Social Criticism 46 (2):173-182 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Neopragmatist epistemology rejects any significant distinction between ethics and the sciences. The idea is that in ethics, we acquire knowledge in similar ways as in the natural sciences. Quine/duhem holism applies to both fields, which explains why the aim of reaching reflective equilibrium is prominent in many meta-ethical accounts: As in the sciences, our ethical system of belief is constrained by logic, observation, coherence, simplicity and parsimony. Whereas considerations of beauty (an important ingredient of scientific methodology) are irrelevant in ethical epistemology, emotions play an essential role; these, in turn, do not matter in the sciences.

Author's Profile

Olaf L. Müller
Humboldt University, Berlin

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-23

Downloads
238 (#58,979)

6 months
81 (#46,185)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?