What Aristotelian Decisions Cannot Be

Ancient Philosophy 36 (1):173-195 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I argue that Aristotelian decisions (προαιρέσεις) cannot be conceived of as based solely on wish (βούλησις) and deliberation (βούλευσις), as the standard picture (most influentially argued for in Anscombe's "Thought and Action in Aristotle", in R. Bambrough ed. New Essays on Plato and Aristotle. London: Routledge, 1965) suggests. Although some features of the standard view are correct (such as that decisions have essential connection to deliberation and that wish always plays a crucial role in the formation of a decision), Aristotelian decisions sometimes must include non-rational desires such as appetite. Consequently, any exegetical account of Aristotle’s notion of decision must be able to accommodate this feature.
ISBN(s)
0740-2007
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MLLWAD
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-05-12
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 61 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-05-12

Total views
343 ( #9,489 of 42,408 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
87 ( #5,925 of 42,408 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.