Investigate Methods for Visualizing the Decision-Making Processes of a Complex AI System, Making Them More Understandable and Trustworthy in financial data analysis

International Transactions on Artificial Intelligence 8 (8):1-21 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been incorporated into financial data analysis at a rapid pace, resulting in the creation of extremely complex models that can process large volumes of data and make important choices like credit scoring, fraud detection, and stock price projections. But these models' complexity—particularly deep learning and ensemble methods—often leads to a lack of transparency, which makes it challenging for stakeholders to comprehend the decision-making process. This opacity has the potential to erode public confidence in AI systems, especially in the financial industry where choices can have big financial repercussions. With an emphasis on financial data analysis, this study explores different approaches to visualizing the decision-making processes of complicated artificial intelligence systems. We investigate various methods of interpretability such as heatmaps, decision trees, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME), and feature importance metrics. These techniques give financial professionals a greater understanding of and confidence in AI-driven judgments by providing means to improve the transparency and comprehensibility of AI systems. The trade-offs between interpretability and model accuracy, the difficulties with bias and fairness in financial AI, and the significance of maintaining security and privacy in visualization techniques are also covered in the study. Finally, we suggest a paradigm for strengthening the trustworthiness of AI in finance, balancing the requirement for accurate forecasts with openness and ethical considerations.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-03-09

Downloads
126 (#100,288)

6 months
126 (#50,377)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?