Propositions, attitudinal objects, and the distinction between actions and products

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper argues that attitudinal objects, entities of the sort of John's judgment, John's thought, and John's claim, should play the role of propositions, as the cognitive products of cognitive acts, not the acts themselves.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 3 (2015-11-21)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge and its Limits.Williamson, Timothy
Knowledge and its Limits.Williamson, Timothy
What is Meaning.Soames, Scott

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Getting What You Want.Grant, Lyndal & Phillips-Brown, Milo

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
343 ( #8,816 of 40,654 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #31,906 of 40,654 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.