Relational Ethics and Partiality: A Critique of Thad Metz’s ‘Towards an African Moral Theory’

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this article, I question the plausibility of Metz’s African moral theory from an oft-neglected moral topic of partiality. Metz defends an Afro-communitarian moral theory that posits that the rightness of actions is entirely definable by relationships of identity and solidarity (or, friendship). I offer two objections to this relational moral theory. First, I argue that justifying partiality strictly by invoking relationships (of friendship) ultimately fails to properly value the individual for her own sake – this is called the ‘focus problem’ in the literature. Second, I argue that a relationship-based theory cannot accommodate the agent-related partiality since it posits some relationship to be morally fundamental. My critique ultimately reveals the inadequacy of a relationship-based moral theory insofar as it overlooks some crucial moral considerations grounded on the individual herself in her own right.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2017-09-14
Latest version: 2 (2017-10-12)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
950 ( #6,372 of 71,165 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
112 ( #6,030 of 71,165 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.