Mixed strategies can't evade Pascal's Wager

Analysis 71 (4):642-645 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I defend Pascal's Wager from a particular way of evading it, the mixed strategy approach. The mixed strategies approach suggests that Pascal's Wager does not obligate one to believe in God, because one can get the same infinite expected utility from other strategies besides the strategy of believing in God. I will show that while there's nothing technically wrong with the mixed strategy approach, rationality requires it to be applied in such a way that Pascal's Wager doesn't lose any force.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MONMSC
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-05-04
View other versions
Added to PP index
2011-02-17

Total views
252 ( #19,921 of 54,476 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #38,540 of 54,476 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.