Possibility spaces and the notion of novelty: from music to biology

Synthese (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
We provide a new perspective on the relation between the space of description of an object and the appearance of novelties. One of the aims of this perspective is to facilitate the interaction between mathematics and historical sciences. The definition of novelties is paradoxical: if one can define in advance the possibles, then they are not genuinely new. By analyzing the situation in set theory, we show that defining generic (i.e., shared) and specific (i.e., individual) properties of elements of a set are radically different notions. As a result, generic and specific definitions of possibilities cannot be conflated. We argue that genuinely stating possibilities requires that their meaning has to be made explicit. For example, in physics, properties playing theoretical roles are generic; then, generic reasoning is sufficient to define possibilities. By contrast, in music, we argue that specific properties matter, and generic definitions become insufficient. Then, the notion of new possibilities becomes relevant and irreducible. In biology, among other examples, the generic definition of the space of DNA sequences is insufficient to state phenotypic possibilities even if we assume complete genetic determinism. The generic properties of this space are relevant for sequencing or DNA duplication, but they are inadequate to understand phenotypes. We develop a strong concept of biological novelties which justifies the notion of new possibilities and is more robust than the notion of changing description spaces. These biological novelties are not generic outcomes from an initial situation. They are specific and this specificity is associated with biological functions, that is to say, with a specific causal structure. Thus, we think that in contrast with physics, the concept of new possibilities is necessary for biology.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MONPSA-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-07-05
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
In Defense of Proper Functions.Millikan, Ruth Garrett
An Organizational Account of Biological Functions.Mossio, Matteo; Saborido, Cristian & Moreno, Alvaro

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-01-17

Total views
16 ( #39,244 of 40,632 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #31,877 of 40,632 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.