Tactful animals: How the study of touch can inform the animal morality debate

Philosophical Psychology 34 (1):1-27 (2021)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper, we argue that scientists working on the animal morality debate have been operating with a narrow view of morality that prematurely limits the variety of moral practices that animals may be capable of. We show how this bias can be partially corrected by paying more attention to the touch behaviours of animals. We argue that a careful examination of the ways in which animals engage in and navigate touch interactions can shed new light on current debates on animal morality, like the study of consolation behaviour, while also revealing further forms that animal morality may take and that have been neglected so far, like capacities of tolerance or trust. This defence is structured as an analysis of the three main functions of touch: the discriminative function, the affiliative function, and the vigilance function.
Reprint years
2021
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MONTAH-2
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-07-01
Latest version: 4 (2021-02-19)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-07-01

Total views
234 ( #26,778 of 2,448,887 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
49 ( #12,937 of 2,448,887 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.