Unjust War and a Soldier's Moral Dilemma

Journal of Military Ethics 12 (4):325-340 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper explores the central question of why soldiers in democratic societies might decide to fight in wars that they may have reason to believe are objectively or questionably unjust. First, I provide a framework for understanding the dilemma caused by an unjust war and a soldier's competing moral obligations; namely, the obligations to self and state. Next, I address a few traditional key thoughts concerning soldiers and jus ad bellum. This is followed by an exploration of the unique and contradicting moral problems that confront modern soldiers and their officers. I argue that although traditional positions such as invincible ignorance provide a rather dangerous ‘head-in-the-sand’ mentality, soldiers serving a democratic government are nonetheless very limited in their legal and moral ability to interpret what is a justifiable war. However, a very few select senior officers are in positions to make such legal and moral decisions concerning jus ad bellum.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MONUWA
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-11-22
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Jus Post Bellum.Bass, Gary J.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-01-20

Total views
272 ( #10,749 of 39,699 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
62 ( #7,284 of 39,699 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.