Van Fraassen and Ruetsche on preparation and measurement

Philosophy of Science 66 (3):91 (1999)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Ruetsche (1996) has argued that van Fraassen's (1991) Copenhagen Variant of the Modal Interpretation (CVMI) gives unsatisfactory accounts of measurement and of state preparation. I defend the CVMI against Ruetsche's first argument by using decoherence to show that the CVMI does not need to account for the measurement scenario which Ruetsche poses. I then show, however, that there is a problem concerning preparation, and the problem is more serious than the one Ruetsche focuses on. The CVMI makes no substantive predictions for the everyday processes we take to be measurements.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-06-12
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Scientific Image.Friedman, Michael

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Compatibility Between Environment-Induced Decoherence and the Modal-Hamiltonian Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.Lombardi, Olimpia; Ardenghi, Juan Sebastián; Fortin, Sebastian & Castagnino, Mario

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
74 ( #35,623 of 47,408 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #26,598 of 47,408 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.