Debunking Morality: Lessons from the EAAN Literature

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (S1):208-226 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper explores evolutionary debunking arguments as they arise in metaethics against moral realism and in philosophy of religion against naturalism. Both literatures have independently grappled with the question of which beliefs one may use to respond to a potential defeater. In this paper, I show how the literature on the argument against naturalism can help clarify and bring progress to the literature on moral realism with respect to this question. Of note, it will become clear that the objection that the moral realist begs the question, when appealing to the truth of some of her moral beliefs, is unsuccessful.
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MOODML
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-05-06
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-05-06

Total views
880 ( #5,614 of 2,448,212 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
75 ( #7,960 of 2,448,212 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.