Against the Ramsey test

Analysis 64 (4):294-299 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue against the Ramsey test connecting indicative conditionals with conditional probability, by means of examples in which conditional probability is high but the conditional is intuitively implausible. At the end of the paper, I connect these issues to patterns of belief revision.

Author's Profile

Adam Morton
PhD: Princeton University; Last affiliation: University of British Columbia

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
359 (#42,793)

6 months
39 (#82,436)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?