Measurement scales and welfarist social choice

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The social welfare functional approach to social choice theory fails to distinguish a genuine change in individual well-beings from a merely representational change due to the use of different measurement scales. A generalization of the concept of a social welfare functional is introduced that explicitly takes account of the scales that are used to measure well-beings so as to distinguish between these two kinds of changes. This generalization of the standard theoretical framework results in a more satisfactory formulation of welfarism, the doctrine that social alternatives are evaluated and socially ranked solely in terms of the well-beings of the relevant individuals. This scale-dependent form of welfarism is axiomatized using this framework. The implications of this approach for characterizing classes of social welfare orderings are also considered.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MORMSA-10
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-06-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
How Common Standards Can Diminish Collective Intelligence: A Computational Study.Michael Morreau & Aidan Lyon - 2016 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 22 (4):483-489.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-06-08

Total views
130 ( #19,260 of 38,904 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #14,895 of 38,904 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.