Ontological priority, fundamentality and monism

Dialectica 63 (3):271-288 (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In recent work, the interrelated questions of whether there is a fundamental level to reality, whether ontological dependence must have an ultimate ground, and whether the monist thesis should be endorsed that the whole universe is ontologically prior to its parts have been explored with renewed interest. Jonathan Schaffer has provided arguments in favour of 'priority monism' in a series of articles (2003, 2004, 2007a, 2007b, forthcoming). In this paper, these arguments are analysed, and it is claimed that they are not compelling: in particular, the possibility that there is no ultimate level of basic entities that compose everything else is on a par with the possibility of infinite 'upward' complexity. The idea that we must, at any rate, postulate an ontologically fundamental level for methodological reasons ( Cameron 2008 ) is also discussed and found unconvincing: all things considered, there may be good reasons for endorsing 'metaphysical infinitism'. In any event, a higher degree of caution in formulating metaphysical claims than found in the extant literature appears advisable.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MOROPF
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Mereology.Varzi, Achille C.
Ontological Dependence.Tahko, Tuomas & Lowe, E. J.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Boring Infinite Descent.Tahko, Tuomas E.
Priority Monism.Trogdon, Kelly

View all 20 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-09-18

Total views
1,100 ( #2,135 of 45,286 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
120 ( #4,326 of 45,286 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.