Political legitimacy in decisions about experiments in solar radiation management

In William C. G. Burns & Andrew Strauss (eds.), Climate Change Geoengineering: Philosophical Perspectives, Legal Issues, and Governance Frameworks. Cambridge University Press (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Some types of solar radiation management (SRM) research are ethically problematic because they expose persons, animals, and ecosystems to significant risks. In our earlier work, we argued for ethical norms for SRM research based on norms for biomedical research. Biomedical researchers may not conduct research on persons without their consent, but universal consent is impractical for SRM research. We argue that instead of requiring universal consent, ethical norms for SRM research require only political legitimacy in decision-making about global SRM trials. Using Allen Buchanan & Robert Keohane's model of global political legitimacy, we examine several existing global institutions as possible analogues for a politically legitimate SRM decision-making body.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MORPLI
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-07-20
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-08-27

Total views
219 ( #22,590 of 54,568 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #23,915 of 54,568 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.