Doing One's Best, Alternative Possibilities, and Blameworthiness

Critica 46 (136):3-26 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

My main aim in this paper is to improve and give further support to a defense of the Principle of Alternative Possibilities (PAP) against Frankfurt cases which I put forward in some previous work. In the present paper I concentrate on a recent Frankfurt case, Pereboom's "Tax Evasion". After presenting the essentials of my defense of PAP and applying it to this case, I go on to consider several objections that have been (or might be) raised against it and argue that they don't succeed. I conclude by pointing out that my criticism of Pereboom's example suggests a general strategy against other actual or possible Frankfurt cases.

Author's Profile

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-19

Downloads
162 (#78,031)

6 months
50 (#82,990)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?