Supererogation and Conditional Obligation

Philosophical Studies 179 (5):1429–1443 (2022)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
There are plenty of classic paradoxes about conditional obligations, like the duty to be gentle if one is to murder, and about “supererogatory” deeds beyond the call of duty. But little has been said about the intersection of these topics. We develop the first general account of conditional supererogation, with the power to solve familiar puzzles as well as several that we introduce. Our account, moreover, flows from two familiar ideas: that conditionals restrict quantification and that supererogation emerges from a clash between justifying and requiring reasons.
Reprint years
2021, 2022
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2021-06-04
Latest version: 11 (2022-06-03)
View other versions
Added to PP

664 (#10,939)

6 months
232 (#1,855)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?