Three Paradoxes of Supererogation

Noûs (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Supererogatory acts—good deeds “beyond the call of duty”—are a part of moral common sense, but conceptually puzzling. I propose a unified solution to three of the most infamous puzzles: the classic Paradox of Supererogation (if it’s so good, why isn’t it just obligatory?), Horton’s All or Nothing Problem, and Kamm’s Intransitivity Paradox. I conclude that supererogation makes sense if, and only if, the grounds of rightness are multi-dimensional and comparative.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MUOTPO-3
Revision history
First archival date: 2019-10-05
Latest version: 4 (2020-01-10)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
From Rights to Prerogatives.Daniel Muñoz - forthcoming - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Whether and Where to Give.Theron Pummer - 2016 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 44 (1):77-95.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-10-05

Total views
268 ( #16,316 of 48,949 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
137 ( #3,570 of 48,949 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.