Another Blow to Knowledge from Knowledge

Logos and Episteme 4 (3): 311–317 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
A novel argument is offered against the following popular condition on inferential knowledge: a person inferentially knows a conclusion only if they know each of the claims from which they essentially inferred that conclusion. The epistemology of conditional proof reveals that we sometimes come to know conditionals by inferring them from assumptions rather than beliefs. Since knowledge requires belief, cases of knowing via conditional proof refute the popular knowledge from knowledge condition. It also suggests more radical cases against the condition and it brings to light the under-recognized category of inferential basic knowledge.
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-01-06
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
204 ( #31,571 of 65,539 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #44,121 of 65,539 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.