Do people understand determinism? The tracking problem for measuring free will beliefs

Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Experimental work on free will typically relies on deterministic stimuli to elicit judgments of free will. We call this the Vignette-Judgment model. We outline a problem with research based on this model. It seems that people either fail to respond to the deterministic aspects of vignettes when making judgments or that their understanding of determinism differs from researcher expectations. We provide some empirical evidence for this claim. In the end, we argue that people seem to lack facility with the concept of determinism, which calls into question the validity of experimental work operating under the Vignette-Judgment model. We also argue that alternative experimental paradigms are unlikely to elicit judgments that are philosophically relevant to questions about the metaphysics of free will.

Author Profiles

Samuel Murray
Providence College
Thomas Nadelhoffer
College of Charleston

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-06

Downloads
320 (#48,517)

6 months
155 (#17,316)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?