Generalized Revenge

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 98 (1):153-177 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since Saul Kripke’s influential work in the 1970s, the revisionary approach to semantic paradox—the idea that semantic paradoxes must be solved by weakening classical logic—has been increasingly popular. In this paper, we present a new revenge argument to the effect that the main revisionary approaches breed new paradoxes that they are unable to block.

Author Profiles

Julien Murzi
University of Salzburg
Lorenzo Rossi
Università di Torino

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-15

Downloads
351 (#41,950)

6 months
98 (#34,711)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?