O’Connor’s argument for indeterminism

Philosophical Explorations 19 (3):268-275 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Timothy O’Connor has recently defended a version of libertarianism that has significant advantages over similar accounts. One of these is an argument that secures indeterminism on the basis of an argument that shows how causal determinism threatens agency in virtue of the nature of the causal relation involved in free acts. In this paper, I argue that while it does turn out that free acts are not causally determined on O’Connor’s view, this fact is merely stipulative and the argument that he presents for this conclusion begs the question.

Author's Profile

Samuel Murray
Providence College

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-05-25

Downloads
684 (#21,089)

6 months
181 (#14,229)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?