O’Connor’s argument for indeterminism

Philosophical Explorations 19 (3):268-275 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Timothy O’Connor has recently defended a version of libertarianism that has significant advantages over similar accounts. One of these is an argument that secures indeterminism on the basis of an argument that shows how causal determinism threatens agency in virtue of the nature of the causal relation involved in free acts. In this paper, I argue that while it does turn out that free acts are not causally determined on O’Connor’s view, this fact is merely stipulative and the argument that he presents for this conclusion begs the question.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-05-25
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
151 ( #23,325 of 45,415 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
55 ( #13,858 of 45,415 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.