Responsibility and vigilance

Philosophical Studies 174 (2):507-527 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
My primary target in this paper is a puzzle that emerges from the conjunction of several seemingly innocent assumptions in action theory and the metaphysics of moral responsibility. The puzzle I have in mind is this. On one widely held account of moral responsibility, an agent is morally responsible only for those actions or outcomes over which that agent exercises control. Recently, however, some have cited cases where agents appear to be morally responsible without exercising any control. This leads some to abandon the control-based account of responsibility and replace it with an alternative account. It leads others to deny the intuition that agents are responsible in these troublesome cases. After outlining the account of moral responsibility I have in mind, I look at some of the arguments made against the viability of this theory. I show that there are conceptual resources for salvaging the control account, focusing in particular on the nature of vigilance. I also argue that there is empirical data that supports the control account so conceived.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-05-25
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Explaining the Brain.Craver, Carl F.

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Vigilance and Control.Murray, Samuel & Vargas, Manuel
Responsibility for Forgetting.Murray, Samuel; Murray, Elise D.; Stewart, Gregory; Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter & De Brigard, Felipe
Habitual Weakness.Silver, Kenneth

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
409 ( #10,564 of 50,236 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
60 ( #9,311 of 50,236 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.