Knowledge and Reliability

In Hilary Kornblith & Brian McLaughlin (eds.), Alvin Goldman and his Critics. Oxford: Blackwell. pp. 237-256 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Internalists have criticised reliabilism for overlooking the importance of the subject's point of view in the generation of knowledge. This paper argues that there is a troubling ambiguity in the intuitive examples that internalists have used to make their case, and on either way of resolving this ambiguity, reliabilism is untouched. However, the argument used to defend reliabilism against the internalist cases could also be used to defend a more radical form of externalism in epistemology.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
NAGKAR
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2012-03-08

Total views
9,774 ( #167 of 64,182 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
592 ( #518 of 64,182 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.