Agency, authorship, and illusion

Consciousness and Cognition 14 (4):771-785 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Daniel Wegner argues that conscious will is an illusion. I examine the adequacy of his theory of apparent mental causation and whether, if accurate, it suggests that our experience of agency and authorship should be considered illusory. I examine various interpretations of this claim and raise problems for each interpretation. I also distinguish between the experiences of agency and authorship.

Author's Profile

Eddy Nahmias
Georgia State University

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
897 (#14,279)

6 months
125 (#25,939)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?