Can Cumulative Selection Explain Adaptation?

Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1099-1112 (2005)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Two strong arguments have been given in favor of the claim that no selection process can play a role in explaining adaptations. According to the first argument, selection is a negative force; it may explain why the eliminated individuals are eliminated, but it does not explain why the ones that survived (or their offspring) have the traits they have. The second argument points out that the explanandum and the explanans are phenomena at different levels: selection is a population-level phenomenon, whereas adaptation occurs on the individual level. Thus, selection can explain why individuals in a certain population have a certain trait, but it cannot explain why a certain indi- vidual has this trait. After pointing out that both arguments ignore the significance of the limitation of environmental resources, I will construe a positive argument for the claim that cumulative selection processes can, indeed, play a role in explaining adaptations.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2005
PhilPapers/Archive ID
NANCCS
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-01-19
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 26 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
72 ( #37,176 of 49,040 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #43,931 of 49,040 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.